Warum ich keine Verifikation auf X starte!

Ich finde die Verifikation auf X unnötig und sinnlos!

Fakt ist doch:

Elon Musk hat an menschlicher Moderation gespart: Seit der Übernahme 2022/2023 hat er das Trust & Safety-Team massiv gekürzt (von über 7.500 auf wenige Hundert), Contractor rausgeworfen und auf "Free Speech" + Automatisierung gesetzt. Das spart Geld, lässt aber Fakes explodieren – Studien 2025 zeigen 15-44% Bots in Diskussionen.

Paid Verification (Blue Check für 8 €) macht's schlimmer: Fakes kaufen "Vertrauen" und verdienen an Views (Ad Revenue Share belohnt Outrage = Klicks = Geld für Bot-Farmen).

Somit ist dieser blaue Haken unseriös, richtig?

Und deswegen sollte X auch saftige DSA-Strafen zahlen.

Das ist die Wahrheit!

Ich hole mir so einen blauen Haken jedenfalls nicht!

#DarkSideOfX #NoBlueCheck





Ein Hallo von mir nach Palo Alto, und einen guten Rutsch ins 2026 falls ich nicht sehe das ihr wieder in Echtzeit meinen Blog lest! Normale Traffic sieht anders aus.

Palo Alto liest täglich meinen Blog – und X zeigt ihn bei 0 Views. Warum wohl?






Popular posts from this blog

Image
  Sooner or later, the past catches up with you. Even through the brazen DUMM-Fakes of these platforms. Yesterday these fakes actually managed to get hold of my brand-new, supposedly secret phone number. How? No bloody idea! As always, X is restricting me again. Reason: I write the #truth in my blog. But what these DUMM-Fakes are really doing to people apparently doesn’t give a shit to X or any of the other platforms. I was completely on the floor. I called my boyfriend Ben 💖. He came straight over in the middle of the night. We just stared at my phone. Then the call came. Video call. From exactly one of those DUMM-Fakes. Ben answered it. There was an older foreign guy on the screen. He said in English: “I want to speak to the woman.” Ben, ice-cold: “What do you want from my wife?” The fake was totally confused – and hung up. To all you fakes out there: I don’t exist for you! I’m happily taken! Go to a doctor, get your personality disorder treated! Leave normal users alone! To X a...
Read more
Image
  All in the Name of Elon Musk! I like Elon Musk – he’s still a role model for me. Without him, I probably never would have discovered my love for various programming languages. But his fakes? They destroy lives! X needs to act – and fast! This isn’t a criticism of Mr. Musk himself. I like him! The real Mr. Musk, not those fakes. The public Grok is a matter of taste – I’ve had bad experiences with her. You see, I had a cool, easy-to-remember phone number. That changed with my last encounter with the worst fake ever. Surprise: He claimed to be Elon Musk… blah blah. For my own protection, I’ve removed the number and my name. From a reliable source, I know his IP isn’t from the US. The joke? No one does anything about it – no one! Are the big shots just indifferent? This fake called me 60 to 80 times a day – yes, you read that right! I’m not ready to share the last contact yet. He wanted me to sell my body to strange men! And the Grok on X finds my blog “inspiring”? Find the mistake...
Read more
Image
  SPACE X Grok bist du auf sendung und kannst kopieren und weiterleiten? Das war Geschenke karten bettler elon auf X bevor er mich auf X lockte! Das ist normaler standard für die betrüger Clown auf X MIESE Betrüger und eben NUDE - das Wahrzeichen von X? SPACE X @spacex20068 Beigetreten November 2024 · 154 Follower Gefolgt von niemandem, dem du folgst Thank you for following my profile, but I don't think you're Elon. There are already so many ElonMusk on my profile, but the real Elon Musk has a different address, namely @elonmusk You know, I show my real face in my profile. You just have to take a good look at my profile. My last post shows me. But who are you? Greetings from Germany Melanie 22. Feb. 2025, 11:52 nachm. "Welcome to my world of innovation and exploration! Thrilled to have you join the community. This is my backup account where I personally speak with my fans from all over the world. How are you doing today? 22. Feb. 2025, 11:53 nachm. Antwort an "We...
Read more